Different Types of Misperception regarding Benevolence


  • Shutaro Kawabe
  • Norimasa Kobayashi


Hypergames, benevolence, misperception


. <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Cambria; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0cm; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> This paper introduces misperception to bilateral decision situations with benevolent players (Bergstrom, 1999) based on hypergame framework (Bennett, 1979). In Bergstrom (1999), a benevolent player not only considers the opponent’s private subutility but also his benevolence towards her. Accordingly, we analyze two cases in which the player misperceives only the opponent’s private subutility and only the opponent’s benevolence respectively. An interesting result we obtained is that misperception of the opponent’s benevolence only has the unit change effect, such that in many applications the effect of opponent’s benevolence may be ignored



How to Cite

Kawabe, S., & Kobayashi, N. (2010). Different Types of Misperception regarding Benevolence. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ISSS - 2010, Waterloo, Canada, 54(1). Retrieved from https://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings54th/article/view/1431